
PHILADELPHIA -- They have nothing in common but history. Chase Utley is a southern California dude with gel in his hair who speaks in cliches and has all the pizzazz of a resin bag. Reggie Jackson was the portrait of flamboyance, the straw that stirred the drink, the problem child who jarred the equilibrium. But today, they are joined in baseball lore by the five home runs each hit in a single World Series, with Utley's latest two shots propelling the Phillies to an 8-6 victory in Game 5 and renewed life for a repeat title.
"It's pretty cool. It's pretty surreal," Utley said with typical nonchalance. "I'm glad we got the win. It was a do-or-die game."
And how about being linked with Reggie, the original Mr. October, as the all-time solo Series slugger? Does that qualify Utley, given the late date, as Mr. November? "Obviously, it's great company. At some point, not right now, maybe I'll look back on it and see what kind of special moment it is," he said. "But right now our goal is to win two more games."
His manager, Charlie Manuel, was left to shrug. "Sometimes, I don't even like to talk about him because he don't want me to," he said. "Actually, he don't like for you [the media] to say a whole lot of things about him. But he's one of the most prepared and dedicated players I've ever been around. He has the most desire and passion to play the game that I've ever been around."
If only Manuel's pitching rotation was as locked in as Utley.Now the conversation in offices across America -- those not run by Steve Carell, that is -- involves pitchers and rest. It's not a riveting topic, not that baseball is a sexy sport, but this is the new fulcrum upon which the World Series pivots. It's an old school vs. new school debate, and what's curious is, young-guy Joe Girardi represents the old way for the Yankees while old-dude Manuel embraces the new way for the Phillies.
Three days or four days between starts?
That is the question.
Monday night, Cliff Lee didn't dominate the Yankees as much as he survived them, allowing five runs in seven innings and gutting out a win. Not as deceptive with his breaking stuff as he was in the Series opener, he had enough to withstand a white-knuckle bullpen stint by a scuffling Ryan Madson -- no Brad Lidge, wisely -- and put the Phillies in Rocky Balboa mode as they head to New York down 3-2. Lee, of course, was held out of Game 4 because Manuel didn't trust his lack of experience on three days' rest. The Phillies opted for the inferior Joe Blanton, and they lost to the Yankees, who used CC Sabathia successfully on three days' rest. Advantage, Girardi, who is having no problem summoning the $161-million Sabathia twice, the $82.5-million A.J. Burnett and 15-year veteran Andy Pettitte each on three days' rest over the final four games of baseball's championship event.
"Well, I mean, this is the World Series," Girardi rationalized. "There is no baseball after the World Series for four or five months, so there will be plenty of time to rest."
I very much agree with the man, even if Burnett, operating on short rest, was ripped apart by the Phillies in a two-inning massacre. Utley, keeping his team alive, hit his fourth homer of the Series, a three-run shot in the first that propelled a potent lineup to a five-run lead over Burnett, who allowed six runs, four hits and four walks. Utley added another in the seventh, a solo shot off Phil Coke. The option for Burnett would have been journeyman Chad Gaudin, and anyone asking "Who's he?" is answering the question of why Girardi made the right call with three-day-rest urgency. If the Yankees can't squeeze one victory out of Burnett, Pettitte and Sabathia in the final three games, they don't deserve to win the Series. My guess is, this will end in Game 6 at Yankee Stadium when Alex Rodriguez follows fate's script, hits a monster home run off Pedro Martinez and gives Pettitte enough juice -- oops, considering he's a former 'roider, let's say support -- to build the bridge to Mariano Rivera.
"No, I don't think there was any correlation," Girardi said of Burnett on short rest. "He just lacked command to night similar to what he did in Anaheim. But he was able to recover better there. Tonight he just wasn't able to get it going."Nor will Burnett's rough start affect Girardi's decision on Pettitte. "We're going to check with Andy [Tuesday] when we work out at 4 p.m., and then I'll announce it then," he said. "Physically I've got to see how he is. He threw a side [session on Monday] and felt good."
Besides, hasn't Manuel already played the wrong hand in this poker game? Despite Burnett's issues, and the possibility of a fatigued Pettitte encountering his own troubles Wednesday against a rested Martinez, the sense remains strong that Manuel may have blown the Series by refusing to start Lee in Game 4. If for no other reason, the Phillies' ace would have been available to start, with one extra day of rest, in a Game 7. Now, Lee only can be part of a relief free-for-all Thursday night with only two days' rest after his 112-pitch stint, forcing Manuel to likely start a soft, mentally wrecked Cole Hamels if there is a deciding game in the Bronx.
Gulp.
And to think the Philadelphia Inquirer had to apologize for running a Macy's ad that congratulated the Phillies for winning back-to-back titles. Obviously, Macy's hasn't watched Hamels. A lethal force last autumn as MVP of the World Series and National League Championship Series, the 25-year-old lefty has turned into the newest snack food in the Tastykake bakery empire. Take your pick, Kandy Kakes or Krimpets. Hamels is mushier than anything on the convenience-store shelves. It's disconcerting enough that he is 1-2 with a 7.58 ERA in his four postseason starts, a total reversal from his 4-1, 1.80 ERA brilliance of 2008. What's worse is his attitude, which falls somewhere between a moper and a quitter. There isn't much in the way of toughness, such as in Game 3, when he retired 10 of the first 11 batters, then melted down when he didn't get a call on 3-2 pitch to Mark Teixeira. Next thing you knew, Rodriguez was blasting his double-ruled-homer off the Fox camera in right field, and Hamels would depart quickly after another failed start. Afterward, he alarmed his Phillies bosses by uttering words that no major-leaguer should say after Game 3 of a World Series -- or, really, ever.
"I can't wait for it to end," Hamels said of his 2009, which included a 10-11 record and 4.32 ERA in the regular season. "It's been mentally draining. At year's end, you just can't wait for a fresh start."
Said Manuel: "I was totally surprised with what he said. I don't know exactly what he meant by that. But at the same time, I understand his frustration. When I look at him sometimes, he was the MVP of the World Series last year. If you stop and look at it, he's been a top-rated pitcher ever since he's come up. This year has been tough on him. He's kind of had a weird year. What he's going through right now, it's going to be an experience, because he's going through the part where he's failed.
"I would never question his mental toughness. I think at times he gets a little upset with himself, but as far as his mental toughness, this guy, he's mentally tough. I still think all that [quality stuff] is there, and he'll get back there [to being a top-notch pitcher]. And I think this is something new to him. Every guy goes through it."
After the game, Hamels sought to clarify his remarks. In the NL playoffs, he had to do a similar about-face after shooting a dirty look at Utley, who had committed a throwing error. "Sometimes I might not say the best things or the smartest things, but I've learned and am learning," Hamels said. "I wasn't able to sleep the past couple of nights because of it."
Can he retrieve his lost grit in two days? "I really do hope I have that opportunity," Hamels said of Game 7. "It's one of those games where you can redeem yourself.""I wouldn't be hesitant to start him, but we'll see how the series goes," Manuel said. "He showed you for three innings that he can pitch. I look at that. If he can do it for three innings, why can't he keep going? That's kind of how I look at it."
What happened to Hamels? He hasn't developed a effective curveball to augment his fastball and changeup, a weakness the hitters have figured out. He also had a sore elbow in spring training that probably has bothered him since, at least more than he has let on. Still, the Phillies expected more from his heart. "I think he had a short winter. I think he was very active last winter as far as going around and receiving awards, going and doing things," Manuel said. "And then all of a sudden this year, he struggles. It's been a big change for him in how people look at him or his status and things like that and people's demands of him. This winter, he needs to get a clear head and come back with the ideal of thinking more about baseball and really concentrate and stay focused on his pitching. This guy was one of the most focused guys that I've seen in a long time, and he's still got that same ability. There's no reason why he can't be the same pitcher that we project, and I'm sure he will be."
But for now, he is a head case. It's something Manuel should have weighed heavily when he made the call to save Lee and leave Game 4 for Blanton, who allowed four runs in six innings and put pressure on uptight teammates who made fundamental blunders and struggled to score off Sabathia. Manuel was hesitant because Lee never has started on three days' rest, has arm woes two years ago and, at 6-3 and 190 pounds, doesn't have the body strength of the 6-7, 300-pound Sabathia. "We're going to experiment with Cliff Lee in the World Series?" Manuel said. "Also, his workload and everything and his routine. I'll throw a pitcher out there during the season, and if I don't have him in his role or something like that, like you guys ask me about that all the time -- what about if I start messing with Cliff Lee and take him out of his routine and his days' rest and everything?
"I've seen it both ways. I've seen it work, and I've seen it not work. If we would have pitched Lee [on Sunday] and he would have won, we'd still need to win [Monday]. And who's to say who's to say he might not pitch again."
But only an inning or two -- as opposed to multiple innings. Girardi would have Sabathia and ride him into the sixth or seventh. This doesn't necessarily mean Girardi is outmanaging the country fellow; it means he is taking advantage of the best pitching rotation money can buy. What Manuel has done is blow a wonderful opportunity to match Girardi's rotation the best he can, with a pitcher delivering an all-time performance.
"What's that old saying, 'Spahn and Sain, pray for rain?' Got an off-day tomorrow, maybe it'll rain the next day," Manuel said, wryly. "I can get Lee in on three days, like you guys are talking about. No, I look at it as the seventh game would be on his day to throw in the bullpen, and I'll see what goes on from there. I'll talk to him about what he thinks about if he can pitch at all or something."
"As for my availability, I'm available," said Lee, who has said all along that he's up for any situation. "I think I'll be fine. You're going to have to talk to Charlie. I don't know what his plans are. I'll be ready to pitch whenever they want me to."
Point is, Lee feels fine. As Girardi said, "I think the important thing on short rest is you have to know how your pitcher physically is feeling." Girardi went with the three-day hunch. Manuel did not.
Remember that if -- and when -- than Yankees are celebrating another World Series championship. And when the Phillies are relinquishing theirs.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-03-2009 @ 6:18AM
dfrancis1958 said...
you AGREE w/girardi, pitching burnett on 3 days rest SCHOCKING, JAY, the results speak for themselves, 2 innings, 6 RUNS, his shortest outing since 2007. petitte hasn't pitched on 3 days rest all year, lets see how he fares, harold reynolds thinks this is a mistake, and he seems to make a lot more sense about it than you do.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 10:51AM
tonytiger18 said...
Everyone is a genius after the fact.
Burnett couldn't get in a zone and out of the first inning.
Give credit to Utley especially when he stole second in the third inning thta contrubuted to Burnett's demise.
The ball beat him and Jeter didn't handle the tough throw that was low. He catches it--Utley is out and who knows what will follow.
I was taught that, when I playd ball,if in an attempt to bunt, if I miss the ball and it hits me, then I am out.
I was suprised that Gerardi didn't argue more vehemently than he did.
Key play, Vittorino was hit but he was trying to bunt and it appeared that he put the bat out for the bunt and he couldn't pull it back.
Next pitch---three run homer.
Those were the difference in the game --Jeter not catching the throw and the ump's explanation on that bunt attempt.
Still the Yankees showed their fortitude and almost made another stromg attempt to win.
11-03-2009 @ 12:09PM
Jim said...
I can't agree, tonytiger18. Jeter came out in front of the bag to stop the throw. Even had he caught it, it would have required a sweep tag and that would not have worked. He was too far in front of the bag (which he had to do when he saw that the throw was not going to make it to send on the fly). Good play by Jeter to stop the ball from getting into centerfield.
As for the bunt, Victorino was clearly moving the barrel of the bat back out of the way. That's not a bunt attempt. And I have seen a lot of baseball in my life and I have never seen a player called out when being hit by a pitch while bunting. I have seen them denied first base (no HBP) because they did not try to get out of the way, but no one was ever called out. Not in a major league game. If the ball hit his hand while attempting a bunt and the ball stayed fair, then it's a live ball. But he would not be called out just by virtue of being hit by the ball.
11-03-2009 @ 6:36AM
karog14 said...
The Yankees need to add an important note to their scouting reports about Utley........don't give him a beautiful pitch straight down the middle of the plate anymore!! He will do exactly what any good power hitter will do.....cream the ball!
Rodriguez would do the same thing........
Better to walk him if the pitcher is having location-control problems.......
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 12:08PM
mister8116 said...
they would have loved to clinch their 27th World Series championship on the hostile and dump of ground of Citizens Bank Park. But what better way to cap the inaugural season at the new Yankee Stadium than a series-clinching victory in front of approximately 50,000 of the loudest and proudest Bronx faithful?
11-03-2009 @ 7:24AM
bonypix said...
I half expected Yankees would lose against Cliff Lee. He is one tough pitcher. I predicted Yankees would win in 6. I still think they do. Now if only the bats came alive more throughout the lineup, game 6 would be a real crowd pleaser. Go Yanks.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 7:33AM
Paul said...
Hamels like alot of young people in all types of vocations may have already seen his best year last year..He may very well be a spoiled and over rated player who like a child actor is one and done.....Getting married may have been a curse as it was for Tiger Woods.Priorities are different and what rich young man wouldn't rather be with their newlywed instead of working. It's just a theory but it does make you think !! Pedro is the MAN.....I'd sure like to see him be NY's DADDY Wednesday , Lee on Thursday and Hamels traded while he still has some value........
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 8:50AM
laa300 said...
Getting married was a curse for Tiger Woods? What planet are you from?
11-03-2009 @ 7:36AM
Runtmedic said...
What can you say the more money you spend anyone can win a world series, yankees have been doing it before the time of dinosaurs. Almost any sport these days we see this. Why players dont have loyalty any more show me the money.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 8:32AM
rwwhit said...
You could argue that Blanton pitched better than Lee. And you'd have to assume Lee would not pitch better with less rest. Girardi's comments about Burnett could easily describe a tired pithcher. Petitte gets lit up tomorrow and it goes to game 7. Have to agree that it's scary to have it come down to Hamels, but for one game...who knows?
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 9:16AM
b said...
I disagree with the author and submit that the situation inures to the Phillies' benefit.
If you believe in probabilities [which I do], statistics indicate that postseason starting pitchers throwing on 3 days' rest lose much more frequently than they win, although the Big Hoss [CC Sabathia] pitched well enough to win his last time out on three days' rest, so perhaps that augers well for the Yankees in an if-needed game seven.
Petitte isn't getting any younger.
Every time the Bombers send out a starter on 3 days rest the probability of a poor result [or for a good result from the Phillie's perspective] increases.
Either way, I just want more games to watch and don't really care who wins in the end. Either team will make a worthy champion.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 9:36AM
Robb said...
Hey, Jay. You are off base, literally and figuratively.
Burnett was a mess.
Chances are, Pettite might be, and Sabathia--------he wasn't lights out either.
It's going to come down to the hitters in Game 6, not the pitchers, unless it's Martinez who comes out dazzling.
This is going to 7 games, and anything can happen then.
He'll start Hamels, with a really short leash, with Lee and Happ to back him up, if it goes to 7.
Sabathia will have no one but Burnett behind him, and that's problematic for the Yankees than the Phillies' situation.
I think you are way off about this one.
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 10:42AM
kelly said...
resin bag=utley? don't be dissing my man. I believe in Phillies. Yes, they can possibly pull it off. Let's see, phillies win=the hard work and determination of some awesome players and men. Ah, yankees=roid cloud over heads. maybe they can do commercial....Hey, got juice? Hands down the phillies can be proud either way. They played the old fashioned way. no roids hangin in the air. RESPECT oh yea!!!
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 10:46AM
kelly said...
I tip my hat w/respect to the phillies, for gettin me pumped about baseball again. LUV U GUYS!!!!
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 11:05AM
kelly said...
Let's see, up and coming players hungry for respect,etc. Hey they can look up to the yankees. what kind of message are they saying about the game of baseball? They showing the young ones::IF YA GOT SOME JUICE, THROW IN TONS OF MONEY FOR TAINTED PLAYERS, YOU'LL BE A WINNER TOO!!
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 11:16AM
Clayton said...
I think Charlie's strategy would look pretty sterling if Lidge holds the tie in the 9th on Sunday. Blanton pitched pretty well, and matched up ok with CC. He gave up 4 runs and five hits in 6 innings with no walks. Sabbathia gave up 3 runs and seven hits walked several.
The whole issue of pitching on short rest is interesting, kind of a crap shoot. Sabbathia looked pretty good, but not great. Burnett looked awful. Pettite has so much experience you expect more from him, but if the Phillies come to the plate with a game plan and make Pettite really work, who knows. And if there is a game 7, and that's a big if, I would be really surprised if CC was as effective as he was in a losing effort in game one. I have no idea who Charlie will throw after hearing Hamels' comments. Even though the worst of his statement was taken out of context, he still seems mentally shaken. I might well go with Happ to start and have Lee and everyone up to Steve Carlton ready to come in. That's if it gets to a game 7...Great drama!
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 11:19AM
Clayton said...
tony tiger:I was taught that, when I playd ball,if in an attempt to bunt, if I miss the ball and it hits me, then I am out.
Tony, I don't know who taught you baseball, but if you get hit trying to bunt, it's a hit by pitch. In what possible way could that have been an out?
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 11:32AM
billyp01 said...
you have 2 old pitchers in game 6, one on 3 days rest and one on 5 days rest. ill take pedro anyday. the phils bats have phinally come alive!
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 12:01PM
Jim said...
I'm really having trouble following Jay's comments here. The Yankees used Sabathia "successfully" on three days rest against the "inferior" Blanton. Blanton gave up four runs (on a seeing-eye single by Jeter and a bloop single by Damon) while Sabathia gave up three runs (while several rocket shots by the Phillies in his last inning were right at Yankee defenders). Somewhere between 3 and 4 runs is the difference between "success" and "inferior." Had the Phillies won in extra innings, would Blanton suddenly have been the "successful" choice?
Reply
11-03-2009 @ 12:08PM
mister8116 said...
they would have loved to clinch their 27th World Series championship on the hostile ans disgusting ground of Citizens Bank Park. But what better way to cap the inaugural season at the new Yankee Stadium than a series-clinching victory in front of approximately 50,000 of the loudest and proudest Bronx faithful?
Reply