.jpg)
COPENHAGEN -- Oprah is here. Oprah is smiling. Oprah is talking to the Great Danes, both humans and dogs. Oprah is shopping on the Stroget, the world's longest pedestrian street, carrying a colorful bag with just-bought goodies. Oprah is ready to pump flesh and exchange hugs with any and all International Olympic Committee members -- or, better still, their wives. Oprah even has no problem, after a long plane ride, appearing at a Chicago 2016 dinner/revival/love-in with hundreds of supporters.
More From Mariotti: Now That He's Going, Obama Better Win
"For me, this is beyond exciting because here we are, just hours away from a decision that could be a landmark in Chicago history," the indefatigable Ms. Winfrey said. "For us to be able to host the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games would be what my grandmother used to call our crowning glory -- something that certainly would be worthy of a brand-new star on our Chicago flag. It's tremendous that we are all here as we now sprint to the finish line on Friday with the best team captain and co-captain we could ever have."
As anticipated, Oprah kept a promise to President Obama and the first lady and flew overseas to support Chicago's Olympic campaign, which continues to resemble a Steelers-Ravens trash-talkfest more than an elegant competition. Too bad the same schedule couldn't be kept by Michael Jordan, who is associated with Chicago more than any human being alive -- including Winfrey -- and has mere hours to get his expanding gut to Denmark, start politicking starstruck IOC voters and give new meaning to "Come Fly With Me." Amid a hotly competitive backdrop that welcomed Michelle Obama and her rivals Wednesday and awaits the arrival of her husband Friday, it occurred to the ever-nitpicking American media that one of the planet's most recognizable figures is MIA.
Nor is MJ expected in town, according to the Chicago 2016 camp. "A scheduling conflict," said a bid spokesman, offering no specifics. Which means advantage, Rio de Janeiro, in this category, because Brazil has its most famous sports legend in the house. And how fascinating, in the spirit of the crossfire, to hear Pele point out that he is here and Jordan is not in reponse to a direct question about the absence of the the greatest basketball player ever.
"It is important to participate when your country needs you," Pele said at a press conference. "If I have to die for my country, I would die for my country. If I have to die for my sport, I would die for my sport. I feel very happy if I can help my country."
At first, Pele referred to Jordan as "Michael Jackson," which drew howls in the room. Sad to say, Jordan has as much chance of showing up as Jackson. Never mind that a statue was erected for him outside the United Center, where he led the Bulls to six NBA championships. Never mind that Chicago adores him more than an 82-degree sunny day. Never mind that he won two Olympic gold medals and was the foremost member of the heralded Dream Team. When he didn't show up at a major fund-raising function last month, on a night when the Dream Team was inducted into the U.S. Olympic Committee Hall of Fame, it was Mike's way of saying he wouldn't be hob-nobbing with the Jorges, Henriks and Jacques of the IOC world.
Which is pretty lame, if you ask me. Just what is Jordan doing these days, anyway? One son is a junior at the University of Illinois who decided to leave the basketball program; the other is a freshman at the University of Central Florida, where he'll play basketball. He supposedly is running the Charlotte Bobcats, but why do so many people in North Carolina complain that he's an absentee executive who operates the franchise out of Chicago? He just delivered a rambling speech at the Basketball Hall of Fame that I defended but many others derided as selfish, bitter and miserable, all the more reason to do a good deed for Chicago and America. He lives in south Florida with his new girlfriend, model Yvette Prieto. Couldn't he pull away from her for 36 hours and help out the president?There was a moment here when David Robinson, an original Dream Teamer who is representing the Chicago bid, was chatting with IOC members. Michelle Obama, whose maiden name is Robinson, approached him and said, "I know who you are! Another Robinson. I tell people we're related." Don't get me wrong: David Robinson is a wonderful American and an asset to anyone's bid. But think of the impact if Jordan had been the one schmoozing.
On the eve of the presentations, the vote and the announcement -- which will come just before high noon in the Midwest -- the growing sense is that Chicago is pulling away from the competition. In difficult economic times, Rio is too great a financial and logistical risk. In the bad timing department, the city had to cancel a World Cup swimming event next month due to lack of money. "There are no financial resources. They cannot find any funding. They say they cannot do it," said Cornel Marculescu, executive director of FINA, swimming's governing body. There is a strong sentiment -- even among U.S. sportswriters, if that matters -- to have the Games in an exotic location where the nights are long and the thong bikini happened to be invented. But 2009 might be a weak time for practicality, which is why Chicago makes more sense. You wonder if Rio has the money and time to finish $11 billion in infrastructure initiatives when Chicago's infrastructure largely is in place, except for a makeshift Olympic Stadium to be built 10 miles from the city core, not terribly far from the home the Obamas keep on the South Side.
Nor did it help Rio when the vice president of the Spanish Olympic Committee, Jose Maria Odriozola, continued the crossfire between bid cities Wednesday when he told the Efe news agency, "Rio is the worst bid" of the four candidates. "The IOC is not going to risk it and take the games to a site where it doesn't have total confidence that it can be done well," said Odriozola, which prompted the Rio bid team to submit a formal complaint to the IOC. This is interesting in that Rio representatives have spent the week forecasting a victory and saying Obama's presence "changes nothing." Those Brazilians can dish out the trash, but apparently, they can't take it.
"This gentleman is clearly out of step with the report of the IOC's own Evaluation Commission," Rio 2016 said in a statement.
What Rio can't refute is its crime problem. The homicide rate is much higher than Chicago -- and, for that matter, Madrid and Tokyo. With terrorism casting a permanent dark cloud over every major sports event, murder and drugs don't seem like an appetizing part of an Olympic formula. The sturdy pick seems to be Chicago, unless there's an upset and the European influences in the IOC push for Madrid.
"As my husband would say, are we fired up and ready to go here?" said Michelle Obama, who was wooing IOC voters only minutes after arriving. "When I looked at the bid initially, I was overwhelmed at what a beautiful concept was presented. Everything about this bid speaks to what the city has to offer. Using the lakefront, using the existing park structure to ensure we're making the kinds of investments and will have the kind of leave-behinds that will benefit the city in the long run."It will be an athletes' paradise in so many ways, and we will have it at a time in the city's climate that it will actually be nice. The lake won't be frozen over. So I am thrilled, I am proud of our bid and I'm proud of our team. So I have to ask you, are we ready to go with this?"
The assembled Chicago partisans roared like they were watching a Jay Cutler touchdown pass. In unison, they await the president, who arrives too late to have solo conversations with IOC members. Will that be a tactical error? Remember, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Russian President Vladimir Putin did plenty of productive one-on-one work in securing the last two Olympic bids at IOC meetings. Will the first lady impress these voters by her lonesome? Or will they view her as the No. 2 weapon when they want to see The Man?
"We're Chicago, we're the U.S., we're going to be the best we can," said Pat Ryan, Chicago's bid leader. "We don't want to get into the political competition that way. This is about sport. It's not about the influence of any individual."
Oh, but it is. And Michael Jeffrey Jordan, wherever he is, would have helped the cause dramatically. Unless a valid excuse is forthcoming, Chicago should feel insulted.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
10-01-2009 @ 11:12AM
DB said...
Michael Jordan is a bitter, selfish prick and always has been. Wilt Chamberlain was a better player and a more interesting person. Go sell your child labor Nikes and count your money Mike! That's what you're really good at
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 1:02PM
SWUknow said...
DB you are a jerk, just get off your rear end(oops if you had one) and get a job and stop looking for quick illegal scheme that got you were you at.
10-01-2009 @ 11:51AM
ed344mu said...
DB, you might be right about your assessment of Jordan's character, but you're way off stating that Chamberlain was a better player. I watched them both throughout their careers, result: no contest!
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 8:41AM
Mgr, MSBL CHAMPS said...
I also saw Chamberlain and Jordan throughout their careers and Wilt was by far the greatest basketball player ever. This is one instance where you can honestly say there is simply no comparison.
Wilt's number are staggering: 100 points in one game and 55 rebounds (against Bill Russell's Celtics no less!) in another. He also averaged 50.4 ppg for an entire season. Just think about that, when Wilt when out and got 46 points that was an off game and he had to score 54 the next night just to get his average back to normal. His top four seasons in PPG are better than Jordan's best year.
Wilt led the the league in FG% 9 times in 16 seasons and shot over 50% 12 times. Jordan never led the league in that category and was a sub .500% shooter for his career. And for those of you who think Wilt just dunked, you're wrong. He had a deadly turnaround fade away jumper that was unstoppable.
Chamberlain averaged over 20 rebounds per game for 12 of his 16 seasons and averaged more than 25 RPG three times!. He led the league in that category 11 times. His career mark of 22.9 is the highest of all time.
It's too bad the NBA didn't keep track of blocked shots or steals when Wilt played. I marvel at the number of triple doubles he would've had. It would've been a routine occurence throughout most of his career.
Chamberlain didn't get the "star" treatment from referees that Jordan got. In his era, there was no third step off the dribble and palming the ball, which Jordan did everytime he touched it, wasn't allowed.
Wilt Chamberlain was simply the most dominant player to ever play the game. People say he had no competition, but they're dead wrong about that. Chamberlain played against the likes of Bob Lanier, Bill Russell, Walt Bellamy, Nate Thurmond and Wes Unseld.
10-01-2009 @ 12:51PM
Nate said...
As a North Carolina resident (but not a Tar Heel fan) I agree that Jordan is an absentee executive of the Bobcats. He seems to treat the job as a hobby rather than a job or a responsibility, as well as a way to remain in the limelight. Undeniably one of the hardest workers as a player, he doesnt appear willing to exert himself to do the hard day to day work and preparation required of an NBA team executive. His judgement on basketball matters continues to be in serious question, as it has been since his days with the Wizards, and if he adds anything of value to the Bobcat franchise it is not apparent to myself nor a large segment of Bobcat fans. Even the star power and glitz and glamour of his name and celebrity is of little consequence, as he doesnt make himself available to the team in that capacity on any kind of regular basis. To much golf to play and underwear and gatoraide commercials to make, I suppose.
He has done nothing to silence the critics who questioned the Bobcats owner when he brought him aboard and gave him a job title that is vague, self important sounding and understood by almost no one.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 1:35PM
Nick said...
I live in Chicago and I just don't care if we get it. I will admit to enjoying seeing Daley defeated though, this guy is a moron.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 2:30PM
cjgdnight said...
So jay, if the vote is as dominated by Chicago as you say it is, why is the president spending time wooing the committee... should be a slam dunk and not require his executive bandwidth.
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 10:02AM
go2theant said...
I agree. I too am from NC. I almost forgot he was part owner. We were excited at first to have an NC person as owner, especially Jordan. We figured he would bring some of that Chapel Hill spirit with him. He is a ghost around here. As well as all the Bobcat owners. A real disappointment. His Olympic snub doesn't surprise me. Shame he forgets the support he had along the way.
10-01-2009 @ 5:01PM
oxhartly said...
As a Chicagoan I have mixed feelings about the games being brought her. On the one hand, it would be a lot of fun to host, on the other hand, Id love to see the IOC jam it up Daley's ass and give it to Rio.
Reply
10-01-2009 @ 7:33PM
cterry9478 said...
Going to Portillo`s is worth the four hour drive from Detroit.
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 9:31AM
rachillsplace said...
I agree. Portillo's is worth the 7 hour drive from Minneapolis.
10-02-2009 @ 6:29AM
Ken said...
Why would anybody want to see Chicago get the Olympics. They are without a doubt the most crooked city in the U.S. I can just see all of the political crooks lining up at the trough for their share of the money the Olympics would bring.
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 6:44AM
Rosemary said...
Personally, I hope Chicago doesn't get the bid. Perhaps then Obama will sense that not everyone kisses his feet. And the same goes for Oprah.
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 6:48AM
Kemetica2 said...
what's a "tar heel fan"
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 7:54AM
timeformusic said...
If you would have typed that into your search engine, you wouldn't still be waiting for an answer.
10-02-2009 @ 11:36AM
Rob said...
"A Tar Heel Fan" is a fan of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where Michael Jordan graduated from and played basketball for before going to the Chicago Bulls. He was on a team that won the national championship, much like this past year, when UNC won the National Championship in men's basketball.
10-02-2009 @ 7:06AM
ROB said...
LOOK WE ALL KNOW THIS IS A DONE DEAL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER. CHICAGO, LIKE THIS PRESIDENT, IS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND DANGEROUS CITIES IN AMERICA. JUST LAST WEEK SOME REALLY WONDERFUL INHABITANTS BEAT AN HONOR STUDENT TO DEATH WITH WOOD-HOW WONDERFUL-SOME OF THE KIDS OBAMA DID COMMUNITY ORGANIZING WITH?
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 7:10AM
Joey said...
I'm about to be sick. Oprah and the Obama's.
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 7:21AM
anna said...
WHERE WOULD THEY PUT ALL THE CRIME IN CHICAGO? THEY WERE SAYING ONE OF THE COUNTRIES IS SO BEAUTIFUL BUT THE CRIME THERE MAY GO AGAINST THEM HAVING IT THERE, BUT WHY AREN'T THEY SAYING THE SAME ABOUT CHICAGO?
Reply
10-02-2009 @ 7:43AM
deanwal said...
Michael isn't a CZAR and knows Chicago AND US taxpayers can't afford to have the olympics there, duh. No wonder he is just behind Tiger in money, he's smart! The only people that will benefit is Obama's friends that can now sell their slum areas, the only people that will MAKE money if olympics come there. I'm hoping for RIO!!
Reply