This is the decade when sports stopped being about sports. So shamefully, too much focus shifted toward an immature and sometimes creepy blogosphere obsession with, oh, I don't know, the women in Matt Leinart's hot tub, the woman on Scott Van Pelt's voice-mail machine, Hannah Storm's outfits, Chris Cooley's penis, an attractive female high-school pole vaulter and, of course, Erin Andrews.Occasionally glancing at such junk through the years, I was whisked into a cross between a frat boy's porn fantasies and a sports remake of Revenge of the Nerds. Who were these geeks? Why was the Internet, once again, giving semi-lives to people with no lives? Didn't it make a supermarket tabloid look responsible and dignified by comparison, or at least until the New York Post crossed every line imaginable? And wasn't there bound to be a cyberspace version of a nuclear explosion, a boiling point where one of the frequent blog subjects became a victim of some sick act?
A second-guess, this is not. I've been saying it for years. And sadly enough, I've feared it would involve Andrews, whose only sin is being good-looking and blond on a powerful television network watched predominantly by sports-and-female-loving males. Am I blaming sports bloggers and their commenters that a very disturbed person secretly videotaped Andrews as she was standing nude in her hotel room, then posted the five-minute video on the Internet? No, I am not, even though the video was posted under the title "Hot naked blonde who looks a lot like a sports blogger favorite in her hotel room.'' But am I blaming bloggers for helping create the daily sex-and-objectification culture that turned Andrews into an ongoing peep show on their Web sites?
Damn right I am.
And I wish they'd grow up -- now, today, yesterday -- before they continue to dumb-down what is left of sports journalism and plunge it into an inescapable sewage pit.
Unlike one of the Erin-consumed leeches -- who admitted this week, "I have never met Erin Andrews,'' -- I have met her as an ESPN colleague. She could not be more friendly and down to earth, which, in this case, probably contributed to the rampant EA Mania. If she were aloof, she wouldn't be nearly as popular and droolworthy among the testosterone-fueled masses. But by smiling everywhere and saying hi to everyone -- from the face-painted freshman at Michigan State to, yes, even the very bloggers who exploit her -- she only fed the monster and left the absurd impression that she actually might dig them. Wrote Christine Brennan, the USA Today columnist: "I wish it didn't happen to Erin, but I also would suggest to her if she asked (and she hasn't) that she rely on her talent and brains and not succumb to the lowest common denominator in sports media by playing to the frat house.'' In truth, Andrews has been vexed in handling the intense amounts of attention, including her distinction as Playboy magazine's "sexiest sportscaster in America.'' One minute, she's on the dance squad at the University of Florida. The next, she's wondering how many millions of perverts are blowing up her photos on the Internet. Or what rumor is surfacing next on a blog about this sex tape or this baseball player or this college basketball player, none of which involved any attempts by the bloggers to substantiate.
But when another sleazy day has ended and the creeps tell their bosses about all their Erin-generated page views, Andrews still has to live with the fallout. She grew to be a well-respected sideline reporter who was placed on college football and basketball because, well, she's young and relates to her audience. They're not stupid in Bristol; she brought in ratings. And for anyone who suggests she exploited sexuality with some of her outfits, I'll remind you that it's 2009 and no one should expect her to dress like a Granny. I've seen Katie Couric wear shorter dresses. Last summer, Chicago Cubs manager Lou Piniella saw her in a stylish summer dress before a game in Milwaukee -- professionally acceptable, according to my sample poll of females -- and cracked, "Is this a baseball game or a modeling assignment?'' That prompted an Illinois sportswriter to columnize that she "sauntered around the visiting clubhouse, flitting from one Cubs player to another. Her skimpy outfit -- designed to accentuate her, um, positives -- had players leering at her.''
What you need to know: Piniella is 65; the writer in his 50s.
"It's really sad that ... I have people watching every single move I make," Andrews told a Minnesota newspaper at the time. "These players are not into me like that. If anything, I think these guys look at me like a little sister or one of the guys. I don't look at myself as a sex object. I've never carried myself in that way. I'm a girl that loves sports. I'm a tomboy. That's the last thing on my mind when I'm in the clubhouse -- worrying about players checking me out.
"I thought at some point we were all past this. I'm not going to change. I can't change.''
Unfortunately, the perverts didn't change, either. It's unconscionable to think a human being would hatch a plot knowing the hotel location, the number of her room and, apparently, when she would disrobe long enough to shoot video footage through the door peephole. She is seeking criminal charges and filing civil lawsuits, but face it, she has been robbed of her privacy and equilibrium forever. How can she return to a hotel room without wondering if someone's peeping? How can she live wondering 24/7 if someone is leering? I wouldn't blame her if she left the sports business and entered the entertainment world. Just a few months ago, USC linebacker Rey Maualuga approached her from behind on the sideline and did a grind dance, which invites other athletes to do the same. But I fully expect her to stand firm and report back to work in September, when her college football duties begin on -- gulp -- college campuses across the land.
It's one thing for a sports media person to be covered aggressively, quite another to be cyber-stalked. For decades, Sports Illustrated has been trotting out bikinied swimsuit models for leering eyes, but the magazine only does so once a year, not every day. What kind of lewd mind lusts publicly for Allison Stokke, a California pole vaulter who became a blog "sex symbol'' at 16, much to the dismay of her father? What kind of idiot is Cooley, the Washington Redskins tight end, for "accidentally'' taking a picture of his penis and posting it? And why would anyone but a blogger care to run audio tape of Van Pelt, the ESPN TV/radio personality, leaving a message for a lady friend? Do these dopes have lives? Have they ever been out on a date?
I'm sure their parents are very proud.
My punishment for writing this, naturally, will be a full-scale assault on my character by these very sites, none of which are worthy of being mentioned on a respectable, globally regarded site such as this. See, these dweebs can dish out the criticism but can't take it. Rather than take on an almighty sports executive -- the real test of a sportswriter in an age when leagues and media are frequent bedfellows -- they go after media people. When a blog gets something right about me, for instance, I'll be the first to say so. To date, they're batting way under the Mendoza line, about .150. A blog said I was with a "semi-hot blonde'' at an NBA party; she was a public-relations person for a player marketing a charity game. A blog was woefully wrong about my salary, just guessing and never bothering to look into it. A blog recklessly ran items that weren't remotely true when I left the Chicago Sun-Times. A blog said I brag endlessly about our TV show in bars; when people ask about Around The Horn, I'm friendly and answer all questions or else I'm called a jerk. A blog said I don't like to have pictures taken in bars; that's true, because I don't want some blogger running a picture and calling me drunk when I've had one beer.
If this is the American Way, what happened to the truth and justice part?
A few years ago, after the blogs had their way with me during another Ozzie Guillen meltdown, I had death threats in Chicago. The newspaper ordered me to have a driver take me to U.S. Cellular Field so I would avoid possible violence in the stadium parking lots. So, sure, the Erin Andrews case gives me the shivers, too. While I'm more Jim Belushi than George Clooney, I think I'll take a good, long look at the peephole the next time I'm in a hotel room.
And wonder what the hell happened to my profession.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
7-23-2009 @ 1:45AM
sportfreak1920 said...
wonderfully written
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:19AM
greatqb44 said...
If it was someone doing it with out her knowledge then blast them and hang em but It looks like she was putting on a show to me
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:42AM
hlyn84 said...
Good story.
I've been appalled by comments from men applauding the pervert's actions in videotaping Ms. Andrews.
How low do you have to be to applaud a criminal action? Is there not enough consentual porn on the internet for your enjoyment? Did you really need to watch this video of a woman being violated and exploited? If so, I think you really need to ask yourself why.
It's too bad that so many men's hormones seem to have compromised their sense of right and wrong. What would you say if some pervert took a peephole video of your wife or daughter and posted the video online? I am sure you would be livid. Then, why does Ms. Andrews not deserve the same respect? Being famous does not make her violation any more acceptable. She is still someone's daughter and family member.
I like sports. I watch ESPN, and I find Ms. Andrews to be a highly capable reporter. It is too bad she can't be judged on her journalistic merits alone, as her male colleagues are. The incidents she has been subjected to prove she has been a victim of a society that objectifies women.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:49AM
tien said...
Jay, I respect your opinions as much as any other sports writer out there, and find much of the criticism (some of which was posted here on Fanhouse) to be unfounded.
I agree 110% with your piece here about the state of the sports reporting world--however, even you have to admit that you do leave yourself as an open target, and someone I respect even more than you certainly made this known not too long ago: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080828/COMMENTARY/808289997
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:59AM
Danielle said...
What do you know: an honorable man. And one who puts his name on the line also. Interesting.
This situation for Ms. Andrews is deplorable and I'm glad to see people who have an actual platform using their powers for good and not evil. I read some comments on another site re: this incident and was sickened to see men hiding behind their screennames admitting that they would (and some already had) view the bootleg video and saw no wrong in doing so. Some even acknowledged they saw no wrong in the actual taping of the incident. Some had the temerity to criticize the quality of the video (the "graininess", not the content).
My thoughts and prayers are with Ms. Andrews and her friends, family, and colleagues.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 3:35AM
William said...
I would love nothing more than to punch you in the face. Your high pitched voice and loud mouth turned me off from watching around the horn. In the case of Erin Andrews, woopity doo she was filmed! Big deal, happens everyday to lots of unsuspecting victims. But apparently now the world should throw their arms up and care because she is rich and famous? That's despicable. I don't know her anymore than I do other girls who have had this happen to them. Unless ESPN plans on suing every guy who has ever filmed a girl naked I could care less. I'm not saying what happened is OK, because it's not. But the media can screw themselves, because she's no bigger than anyone else.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 8:28AM
pepsi21a said...
Wow get off your high horse man. Stop acting like the bloggers of the world created tabloid media. It has been around long before people sat in front of a computer. What makes a sports writer ripping into a player because of a bad game, calling for a person to be fired, making assumptions on people you don't know aside from sitting next to their locker any better? Going on Around the Horn and spreading rumors? The video in question was online in February - and labeled Erin Andrews Naked - yet no one cared! ESPN lawyers - in their infinite wisdom - decide to take action when the video is posted on a blog be e-mailing the blogger to help confirm what wasn't even a story at the time. ESPN has no contacts at Google to have them remove a site from Blogger - which Google owns? They could have kept it completely quiet, investigated, gotten results without having their reporter all over the front page of the POST, and maybe if any network investigated it as much as one of your so called geeky blogs - donchavez.com they would have more info. He has had the best investigation as to the video source, date, history, and theories as to it's distribution. You have to wonder why ESPN would help this story explode. And as for your comment - Who were these geeks? Why was the Internet, once again, giving semi-lives to people with no lives? - We are making a very nice income in a time when 10% of the country is out of work - we all can't jump ship for a new contract like some people - so we write some stories, make our money, and support our families. You don't like it tough.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 8:57AM
ThePiratesFan said...
Jay -- The CBS Early Show, Fox News (including O'Reilly), and the Post all either played snippets of the actual video or took still shots from it. So, how about you get down off your high horse and realize that the main stream media perfected the exploitation angle long before blogs ever came into existence and they're continuing to use it to generate a lot more profit than any blog ever has.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 10:07AM
joe said...
I love how Mariotti calls out bloggers for being geeks and losers. Especially since he's probably the biggest d-bag in sports journalism. Probably was a huge loser in high school who never got laid. Additionally, he's been making a mockery of journalism for at least the past ten years. This guy is repected by NOBODY.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 10:29AM
wardrenfrowsucks said...
I look at you and wonder what happened to your profession, you overblown, self-important, pompous douche.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 11:07AM
Jesse said...
Not cool what happened to Ms. Andrews, I agree 100 percent. The only comment to be made regarding that is that I hope and fully expect the criminal that victimized Ms. Andrews to be brought to justice. I also expect Ms. Andrews to continue with her successful career in the years to come.
But my comments go to a different point Mr. Mariotti all too clearly wanted to make with this column. It was not about Erin Andrews. It was about 'bloggers'.
I do not agree with the venom journalists such as Mr. Mariotti spew at the fact that now we've all got the same level playing field to speak from. You have something to say or report - it gets posted on the net. I've got something to say or report, it also gets posted to the same forum. The same eye balls across the world have an opportunity to read both you and I and that's that.
Deal with it.
I do not understand why journalists get so upset at 'bloggers'. Yes, the majority of them are misinformed. Some would call them 'idiots'. But so what? The utter arrogance and contempt some journalists display toward people who post things onto the net just make you all look like out of touch individuals grasping at the last vestiges of Old Media. I applaud Mr. Mariotti for having embraced the Internet, but I do not subscribe to the assertion you need to somehow be specially qualified to say something on it. It is very elitist to think that way.
But in the end, and with anything else in this country, it all comes down to control and perception. ESPN may control certain aspects of sports coverage on cable, thus generating tremendous amounts of revenue and influence, but it will never completely control it on the Internet.
Deal with it.
Jay Mariotti is a national columnist. In the age of the Internet that means nothing. A person, any person, can create a Web site, start blogging and be read by people from Alaska to Florida. Guess what, now they're the equivalent of a national columnist, too.
Deal with it.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 12:11PM
ICTimer said...
Should I even reply to a Jay Mariotti rant? Do I dare point out that Jay is a huge hypocrite for bashing the work of blogs that he obviously reads? How the hell else would he throw in these bizarre stories that most of us forgot about with the Erin Andrews video? Does Jay Mariotti realize that he uses at least ten rhetorical questions in each column, including one full paragraph of rhetorical questions? Did he forget that rhetorical devices should be used responsibly, not in every other sentence?
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 12:41PM
nolacuse said...
Mr. Marriotti,
I find it a bit hypocritical of you to rant as you do about the dearth of Erin Andrews coverage and how bad it is, but leave out the fact that Fanhouse itself participates in such coverage. You need only go to this link:
http://www.fanhouse.com/tag/Erin+Andrews/
to see how many times Miss Andrews is mentioned. Most of the entries focus on her and many of the entries focused on her have little to do with sports, some none at all. I find it a bit reprehensible that you self-righteously rail at blogs and bloggers while failing to recognize that the company/website for which you work has been a willing participant in the EA obsession.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 12:44PM
nolacuse said...
Wow. I fail big time. I have no idea why I used "dearth" and not "glut" to start that off. Consider me shamed.
7-23-2009 @ 1:10PM
drrocket5292 said...
I just want to know one thing: Did you watch the video? I'm guessing you did. Which, if you clicked the play button on your computer, makes everything you just wrote completely meaningless.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 1:18PM
AJ said...
"your profession" is the cause for 90% of the attention this video has gotten.
The media, in expressing their "outrage" with those viewing the materials have, in effect, made it 10x as bad, spreading the story around, increasing interest, plastering it over every news outlet imaginable.
Let's see a thousand more reporters, each say how disappointed they are in males, their readers, sports fans, etc...all the while, spreading this story and the offending video to every corner of the globe.
The people who should be the most held to blame are those in your profession...infotainment industry people, who further their own ends and visibility by being offended, all the while, making sure not a soul anywhere can avoid this story.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 1:15PM
hughmulls12 said...
You know what's going to help this story go away? You writing and drawing attention to it.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 1:42PM
face844 said...
Why don't you write a column about ESPN's indefensible blackout of the Ben Roethlisberger sexual assault case? That's more embarrassing than anything emanating from the blogosphere.
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:40PM
ben said...
"She [E.A.] grew to be a well-respected sideline reporter who was placed on college football and basketball because, well, she's young and relates to her audience."
...you mean she's hot?
Reply
7-23-2009 @ 2:59PM
SHAT said...
Who's Ray Maualuga? Perhaps you meant "Rey" Mauluga?
Your "respectable, globally regarded site" should hire an editor.
Reply